Talk:Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome

note
Article was extremely interesting and well-written, there was no added media (pics, videos) so consider adding in for the final Wikipedia article. _______________ Total: 18 out of 20 Reviewed by KelseyGratton (talk) 21:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size: 2 3. Readability: 2 4. Refs: 2 5. Links: 1, I think you could add more links to other wikipedia pages to direct readers to more detailed explanations. 6. Responsive to comments: 2 7. Formatting: 2 8. Writing: 2, some grammatical errors but I like that you added short explanations to a word that could be confusing or unknown to readers. 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 10. Outstanding?: 2, Pictures would be a nice addition! And do you know anything about the prognosis of this syndrome? _______________ Total: 19 out of 20 AshleyHardy (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size: 2
 * 3) Readability: 2 *Gets pretty technical in Gene Mutations sections, consider adding in sentences so layperson can read it.
 * 4) Refs: 2
 * 5) Links: 2
 * 6) Responsive to comments: 2 *No comments on page yet.
 * 7) Formatting: 1 *Change the types of brain imaging (MRI and EEG) to be subsections of Brain Imaging
 * 8) Writing: 1 *There were sections in the draft from November 18 with weird wording - the Related Gene Mutations specifically.
 * 9) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 10) Outstanding?: 2

There are some other wikipedia links used; however, I think if more pages were linked, the reader would better understand the article. Been over 5 days since first review and no response. Just make sure to proofread. One heading is messed up (Splice-Site Muation) and there are other minor grammatical errors. Once it is proofread and more links are added, you will be golden!
 * 1) Quality of Information: 2
 * 2) Article size: 2 (~15,300)
 * 3) Readability: 2
 * 4) Refs: 2 (several recent articles linked)
 * 5) Links: 1
 * 1) Responsive to comments: 1
 * 1) Formatting: 2 (followed wikipedia formatting)
 * 2) Writing: 1
 * 1) Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
 * 2) Outstanding?: 1

Total: 16 out of 20 Allison gainer (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. I made some final edits (spelling and grammar fixes and some coding adjustments with headings) as well as adding some clarification along with more linked pages. Let me know if you see anything else. Kathleen Heller (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)