Talk:Kohn Pedersen Fox

Untitled
My concerns - there are no sources listed. No external articles from anywhere else supporting the statements in the article. PEsays (talk) 4:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

article change.
I reverted that a little hastily, but if you want to change the article at least keep the references to their major projects. And try to tone down the cheerleading. Jasongetsdown 19:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

will try and wikify and create some good structure out of the one piece drabble.--Visik 08:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kohn Pedersen Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100320004036/http://www.kpf.com/ to http://www.kpf.com/.
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930161202/http://www.related.com/destinations/HudsonYards/ to http://www.related.com/destinations/HudsonYards/.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

No history?
A first section called "Recent work" is highly unusual. Syced (talk) 07:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree this could be seen as promotional formatting. I am going to switch the section so History shows up first. Please discuss here if you think this is an ill advised change. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Excessive Images of Buildings
Is it okay for this page to have this many images? I understand they're an architecture firm, but this almost seems excessive. I have not come across many architecture Wikipedia pages so maybe I'm just not aware of the norm on a page like this. PubHobbyst (talk) 15:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)