Talk:Kokoro

Fair use rationale for Image:Kokoro01.jpg
Image:Kokoro01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Kokoro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090813231032/http://eurekavideo.co.uk:80/moc/catalogue/kokoro/ to http://www.eurekavideo.co.uk/moc/catalogue/kokoro/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Sources added
Hi fellow editors,

I have scoured hard for both Japanese and English sources for the unsubstantiated claims made in the lead and have finally found great books and articles for information on the book. I aim to trim down the plot summary when I have time, but I believe that the issues of "More citations needed" and "Original research" have been sufficiently addressed—curious to hear what y'all think. Lacanthrope (talk) 05:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)