Talk:Kollam/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Magentic Manifestations (talk · Magentic Manifestations) 16:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Checklist

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Comments
Article does not meet GA criteria 1(b). The lead does not adequately summarize the article; Please refer to WP:LEAD. Secondly, it does not meet the WP:Layout guidelines with text formatting and images are all over the place. Article structure needs rework with many sections needing additional references and citations; references are not formatted properly. General information and characteristics are written like a tourist guide, not to mention a long list of tourist places, companies/industries and people. Only transport, economy and tourism seem to be developed and other sections need further development. Sections like education and healthcare need to provide real information and not list colleges/hospitals. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Fail
Quick fail as this article needs lots of citations and reworking. It fails to meet GA criteria. Article has a scope to be promoted to GA if worked upon. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)