Talk:Kollektsioner

Kollektsioner is not magazine
"contribs)‎ . . (5,171 bytes) (-13)‎ . . (Undid revision 667361844 by Michael Romanov (talk) Please do not add non-existing cats; we have cat 'philatelic journals' and 'philatelic magazines', this falls in the latter)"
 * The fact is that Kollektsioner is NOT magazine. It is an annual philatelic research journal. What's the point in introducing Category:Philatelic magazines? I am returning Kollektsioner to Category:Philatelic journals. --Michael Romanov (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)


 * We use "journal" here as short for "academic journal". This periodical is not peer-reviewed, hence it is a magazine, not a journal. Just like The Wall Street Journal, despite its title, is a newspaper, not an academic journal. --Randykitty (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute. Following this rationale, ALL Category:Philatelic journals are NOT academic journals. Why don't you recategorize ALL Category:Philatelic journals? Please go ahead and make them magazines since they are NOT peer-reviewed by academicians. --Michael Romanov (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)