Talk:Komtar/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 04:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey there! I'll be reviewing this article.  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 15:12, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
 * a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.: - Article seems to be stable, I don't see anything wrong with it.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Initial comments
Article looks good at a glance, I'll have a closer review in a bit.  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 15:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey...are there any further comments for this review? gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 14:47, 9 July 2024 (UTC)