Talk:Koninklijke Paketvaart-Maatschappij

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Koninklijke Paketvaart-Maatschappij. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090525001721/http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67910 to http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67910

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koninklijke Paketvaart-Maatschappij. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210041801/http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/kpm.htm to http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/kpm.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120210041801/http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/kpm.htm to http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/kpm.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Slightly inconsistent citation style
This article appears to follow the citation style of using short footnotes to all cited works listed in the cited works section. There are a few citations which do not follow this style, so unless there is an objection, those citations will also be moved to the Cited works section, and the sources alphabetized as is typical for articles using this style. A notice on the citation style used in this article has been posted on this talk page to provide assistance to those interested in which style is being used for this article. J JMesserly (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I did a lot of referencing by citing books with short footnotes and citing news inside the text, but that it is obviously not correct. Please change it, so I can see the correct way.Grieg2 (talk) 05:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * There really is no one "correct way". The main idea is that it be a rationale that can be consistently followed.  For this article, it appears what contributors are doing is making all references non inline as the notice describes.  If contributors are ok with that description, I will make them all conform to that rule.  If some other rule is desired, I will edit the article to conform to the alternate rule.  I don't really care other than the article conform to some consistent rule that other contributors can understand.J JMesserly (talk) 07:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Further information on this style and considerations for its use may be found in the above note. If after an appropriate time for comment has expired that this is confirmed as the style in use, I or some other citation editors will transform any non conformant citations to the appropriate form.J JMesserly (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)