Talk:Koontz House

dispute
The existence of this dab page was disputed by another editor, expressed by his redirecting the article. Since there are clearly multiple wikipedia-notable Koontz Houses, the removal of the dab page was incorrect. It also is incorrect by Wikipedia procedure to unilaterally delete an article by redirecting it when you know the removal of the article is disputed. The proper procedure is to have an AFD. I am restoring it now. If someone wishes to dispute it please do open a proper AFD. However, you know that the AFD will fail. -- do ncr  am  14:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * At the time of the redirect there was only one article that could be titled Koontz House. You have just now created two more, so a dab page is now appropriate. Station1 (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Your redirecting was unilateral, undiscussed, and wrong IMO, as you know, given that you know that there are multiple wikipedia-notable topics of the name. We've been through this before.  I know you know I know that you think such dab pages shouldn't exist, etc.   Your and my disagreement is not important, can be made moot by creating some of the articles.  In the future, if you are not willing to create some of the articles to satisfy your wish for there to be articles, please let me know and I will create them.  Okay?  Or, open an AFD, which will conclude in the same way (as Keep, with creation of some of the articles to end the discussion). -- do  ncr  am  21:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)