Talk:Koro (language)

Multiple Citations but only a single real source
Most of the news links I've come across are just repackaged versions of the original source: National Geographic Society (2010, October 5). New language identified in remote corner of India; One of thousands of endangered tongues around world.) For instance: My orignal online source for this article is Science Daily: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101005133339.htm
 * The news article from Reuters/Yahoo News (UK & Ireland) (http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20101005/tsc-life-us-india-language-011ccfa.htmlc) is derived from National Geographic.No original research or reporting present.
 * The news article from the Associated Press/Boston.com (http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2010/10/05/undocumented_language_found_hidden_in_india/) is also dervied from the National Geographic article. No original research or reporting present.
 * The BBC article (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11479563) is primarily derived from the National Geographic article, with minor original reporting on what the researches plan to do in the future.
 * Article from UPI (http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2010/10/05/Previously-unknown-language-identified/UPI-37191286312829/) also derived in whole from the National Geographic article. No original research or reporting present.
 * ABC news article (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/10/06/3030550.htm) is also completely derived from National Geographic.