Talk:Korrespondent

DAB an splitting
Should we make separate articles for korrespondent.net site and the Korrespondent (weekly)? They are affiliated but not quite one and the same thing. Much more different than, say, The New York Times and its online edition. --Irpen 02:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess that would be alright.. —dima/talk/ 00:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes we should have separate articles. The current text is clearly rescribing the site, not the magazine. I'm suggesting the split officially. Ukrained (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Split done. Ukrained2012 (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Influence
Korrespondent is not an influential magazine if only because pictures in every single issue grossly otweight the text. The Economist is influential, Foreign Affairs is influential. Korrespondent is not. Also, the reference 1 should be in English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VladVic (talk • contribs) 23:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The Alexa rank may be a sufficient independent indicator of influence. korrespondent.net is 23th in Ukraine. It's also influential among Internet users in Russia, Belarus and Moldova but I'm not sure what net indicator would support this fact. Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korrespondent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100911220110/http://www.kppublications.com/eng/aboutus/ to http://www.kppublications.com/eng/aboutus/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)