Talk:Kosher tax conspiracy theory/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Discuss, don't refute
I looked over the article. It is much improved from the last time I read it. Kudos to all who worked on it. However I don't think it's ready for GA yet. It doesn't have that encyclopedic feel to it. The article spends a lot of time refuting the claim, and very little time discussing the claim. Perhaps a paragraph in the beginning which mentions the origins of this canard and provides some historic context for it. (To be clear I'm not asking for it to be defended, I'm asking for it to be discussed). --Bachrach44 (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you evaluate the article against WP:WIAGA, please, and provide specific criteria for improvement? Thanks, Jclemens (talk) 03:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm too close to the article and many of the editors to provide an unbiased review, which is why I've refrained from doing so. (You'll notice I have not signed up as a reviewer on the GA page either). --Bachrach44 (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In that case, would you mind moving this discussion to the talk page so the editor who does end up reviewing it gets a blank slate with which to work? Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)