Talk:Kovin Fortress

Draft
, I had tagged this as unreferrenced and as a stub. Its not a copyvio, has articles on other wikis, is relatively well written, and doesn't contain any information that would be controversial. I think it might make the most sense to have let it been developed in main space. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * , from the history it appears that there was an edit conflict here, though I got no warning of one. Of course I would not have done what I did if I had known that you had edited the page. The content is, as you say, pretty innocuous; it's also without any citations. I thought (and think) that the best place for the editor to remedy that in peace and at leisure is draft space, so clearly we don't precisely agree on that. My feeling is that we already have more unreferenced content than we can cope with, and should not do anything to add to it. However, please do whatever you think best here, I don't feel strongly about it. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)