Talk:Krishnath College/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tushar Singha (talk · contribs) 03:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)--Peapod21 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Review comment
The article contain language, grammer are correct. There is no template like unreference, citation needed, notability etc. . The article refer from 9 reliable sources.

Review comment
Disagreed. The article's grammar needs a lot of copy-editing. Lines like these: "Since 1853 this college fit to be declared a heritage institution has been unswervingly engaged in promoting and fostering education among the people of four districts such as Murshidabad, " make me doubt the neutrality of the article. It was written like an advertisement. It only has 9 sources, most of them from the school itself, and has no illustrations other than its emblem. It therefore fails points 1, 2, 4, and 6. Jesus, the person who wrote the comment above didn't even write it in correct grammar. You cannot judge an article's prose by its lack of templates. It is, frankly, badly written, and has 7/9 of the sources come from the institution itself or an affiliated institution. It is a far way from reaching any of the four points I stated it failed, and should instantly fail this nomination. I will be adding templates for all the problems. ALSO, the reviewer above attends the college. It says so in his userboxes! This is a clear conflict of interest. Peapod21 (talk) 22:42 June 30, 2017