Talk:Kuch Kuch Hota Hai

Untitled
Article was somewhat disorganized and badly written; rewrote. User:Alwin 08:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Plagiarism?
Unless someone can come up with an actual critic who says that KKHH is plagiarism, I'd like to remove the allegation. Having watched both movies, I don't any plagiarism at all. Zora 06:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

interestin' analysis
KKHH a masterpiece of Indian cinema —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.164.232.85 (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kkhh2.jpg
Image:Kkhh2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kuchkuch.jpg
Image:Kuchkuch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.boxofficeindia.com/Movies/movie_detail/kuch_kuch_hota_hai#.VvRYkbtei1t

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Starring cast
Hey there, since you were involved in a lot of the editing around the time this article went to GA, I'm not exactly clear who the starring cast is. starring currently lists Shah Rukh Khan, Kajol and Rani Mukerji as the stars, but the lead contradicts that, indicating that Mukerji had a supporting role. It would seem that the lede and infobox should indicate consistently the importance of whomever was credited as the stars, and I often see Indian entertainment articles confusing "starring" for "appeared in". If Mukerji got a starring credit, then the lede should reflect that. If she was a supporting cast member who didn't receive the same credit as Khan or Kajol, then she shouldn't be in starring. And if there is any ambiguity about this (some films don't have "starring" credits in their on-screen credit roll, ex: Mean Girls), then we would need to reconsider how to present the appropriate cast members in starring and in the lede. Your input is kindly requested. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * In the opening credits the three of them get equal billing and most everyone else is listed as supporting. Salman Khan is listed as a special appearance at the very end. Bollyjeff  &#124;  talk  23:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi there, thanks for responding. If that's the case, then should the relevant content in the lede be changed? Currently it reads:
 * It features the popular on-screen pair of Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol in their fourth film together, along with Rani Mukerji, and Sana Saeed in her film debut.
 * It presently is ambiguous who the film's stars are, because of the supplementary details about "popular on-screen pair", their film # count, and then noting Saeed's film debut. It also feels like we're suggesting Saeed is a co-star. The simplest fix would be something like:
 * It stars the popular on-screen pair of Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol in their fourth film together, along with Rani Mukerji. The film also marks the film debut of Sana Saeed.
 * There is probably be a better way to phrase it, but I was just going for simplicity. Thoughts? Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What you suggested is better. Bollyjeff  &#124;  talk  00:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)