Talk:Kuhn's Quality Foods

Comments
what else does it need, or need to improve on?

--EditorTruth (talk) 13:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Have a read of WP:Company for an outline of what's needed. MuffledThud (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:I have worked for the company before so this is correct, I would know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorTruth (talk • contribs) 14:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand, but what Wikipedia requires is WP:Verifiability from WP:Reliable sources. MuffledThud (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

?
well some of the info on the site is also from the company policy book, how do i source that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.2.116.194 (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC) --EditorTruth (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I'd stay away from company produced documents such as this. There may be copyright problems.  Also if you are a former employee, you may have a WP:COI--RadioFan (talk) 15:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, in general, independent reliable sources are preferred over self-published or non-independent sources. The company policy manual is definitely self-published. Now, self-published sources can be useful for the company timeline and some basic information, but any of the key claims (e.g., awards won) need verified with independent sources. —C.Fred (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh i understand much more now, I also see that some other people have edited it more completely, and to me it sounds more neutral now that i see the improvements from others from what i had it when i first created it. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorTruth (talk • contribs) 04:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)