Talk:Kumar Suresh Singh

pov concerns
This article reads more than a little like a hagiography. WP:NOT may apply. Ray Talk 06:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ray, I have today made a lot of edits to the article and tried to make all the sentences more objective. Please check and confirm that the language does not give an impression of POV any more. Thanks 122.169.41.133 (talk) 04:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It was hagiographic when I looked at it a few days ago - indeed, it was dreadfully so. I have rewritten the entire article, and little survives from the previous version. Hopefully this is now a bit more appropriate in tone & informative in content. - Sitush (talk) 16:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kumar Suresh Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100417005720/http://www.ansi.gov.in/default.htm to http://www.ansi.gov.in/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Reviews

 * (positive review)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; WBG converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to source a review from his obituary; that ought be removed. Will be obviously hagiographic.
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * More reviews to be noted. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 20:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)