Talk:Kumbha of Mewar

Requested move 21 September 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. If 'Rana' means monarch then it's one of the words we generally omit from noble titles, per the naming conventions. e.g. Pedro I of Brazil rather than Emperor Pedro I. EdJohnston (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Kumbha of Mewar → Rana Kumbha – current title lacks important word Rana and has undue word Mewar -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Capankajsmilyo&project=en.wikipedia.org count])  19:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 23:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose The current title meets the titling standards of Naming conventions (royalty and nobility). The proposed title would not. 209.211.131.181 (talk) 15:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Inconsistency in the death and aftermath section
The last line of second paragraph of the section suggests Raimal sought the help of Delhi Sultan but in the first line of the same paragraph it is clearly mentioned that Udai Singh wanted intervention of Delhi Sultan to regain his lost kingdom.Also the details regarding the battles during this time are missing.It will be great to have those