Talk:Kunza language

Confusing
In the first sentence it is listed as extinct. Further down it is mentioned that the last speaker was found in 1949, then that some have been found later, and finally that there are 2,000 remaining today!?!? Also, the in text references, (Greenberg) and (W. Adelaar), are problematic, as neither are included in the reference section. 212.10.88.98 (talk) 12:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * At least concerning the "2000 remaining" it merely says that there are 2000 Atacameños (people of that tribe) today. It does not specifically state that they speak Kunza. Most likely they speak Spanish. On the other hand, according to the Spanish article "there are still people of advanced age who can remember the meaning of many words..." though no source is given. 186.79.24.241 (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Kaufman (1990)
There's a citation for Kaufman (1990), but what is this? Mcswell (talk) 18:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kunza language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113145613/http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Araucanian_Swadesh_lists to http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Araucanian_Swadesh_lists

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

The language isn't extinct
https://www.npr.org/2024/05/17/1196981058/saving-a-language-in-chile