Talk:Kurt Hummel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I got some time to review now. Will start ASAP! Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! ;) HorrorFan121 (talk) 07:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Fine job! Ref. 48 is pointing to a different Colfer source than indicated... fix, and we're good to go :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! The ref is now properly working. HorrorFan121 (talk) 06:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Yay! Anotha pass :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Kurt Hummel passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: