Talk:Kurt Lightner

Image copyright problem with File:MakingGodSmile.jpg
The image File:MakingGodSmile.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --03:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Takeover
Article changed entirely from one Kurt Lightner to an entirely different Kurt Lightner (though both are artists). This occurred: 02:31, 24 June 2016 by user identified as‎ M567*a (no wikipedia page). To my understanding, what SHOULD take place is: a disambigument Kurt Lightner page - pointing to a Kurt Lightner in Sweden and a Kurt Lightner in New York. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.26.188.198 (talk)
 * Indeed. Let me do a revert and split. Maybe an admin copy the history of the other Kurt to the new page. – robertsky (talk) 04:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.artsy.net/show/contemporary-art-matters-branches. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 09:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)