Talk:Kuselan/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria
This article is in very poor shape. The grammar is extremely poor, it needs a thorough copy-edit. It appears to be a poor translation into English.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Very badly written, see above.
 * The Lead does not fully summarise the article, please read WP:LEAD
 * Contradiction: The lead states that Rajinikanth siad he was making a guest appearance, but the Development section says he was cast in a lead role.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): Two dead links were tagged using WP:CHECKLINKS, another was fixed from an archive source.
 * What makes ref #7 a reliable source?  The reference is badly formatted as well
 * What makes ref #14 a reliable source - it claims to be a "social netwroking utility"
 * What makes ref #16 a reliable source?
 * What makes ref #21 a reliable source?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image in the infobox box needs a caption. I query why an album cover is being used in the infobox to illustrate a film?
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The prose is extremely poor as mentioned above. See if you can get someone else tp copy edit. The WP:Guild of Copyeditors may be able to help. There are also referencing issues. I shall place this on hold for seven days, if you cannot fix it in that time the article will not be listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As the nominator has removed the article from the list at WP:GAN, I shall close this review as not listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image in the infobox box needs a caption. I query why an album cover is being used in the infobox to illustrate a film?
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * The prose is extremely poor as mentioned above. See if you can get someone else tp copy edit. The WP:Guild of Copyeditors may be able to help. There are also referencing issues. I shall place this on hold for seven days, if you cannot fix it in that time the article will not be listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As the nominator has removed the article from the list at WP:GAN, I shall close this review as not listed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)