Talk:Kutha

Bad article
This article printed basically nonsense from a fictional book pretending to be a real occult book taking it's name after a fictional book assuming it was real and had no sources whatsoever. The main Cthulhu article in footnote 6 spefically denied these claims, and I've seen no proof for them either. Somebody apparently confused some poorly researched twaddle somewhere for real facts.

In fact the whole thing would probably be better off deleted. DreamGuy 01:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Removed unsourced controversy section.--Isotope23 16:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * No you didn't. The part you removed is the only part that HAD sources.

Unfortunately I missed Castaneda Dentata's edits placed there earlier trying to claim that my section needed verifying when it was in fact his claims that needed it... He has been harassing me on several articles all over this encyclopedia, largely because I pointed out some amazing errors he placed in articles that demonstrate that he doesn't know what he is talking about. The facts are already cited in the actual text that you removed.

You'll note that the supposed reference in the first part isn't a reference at all but a link to an old copy of this article, which means Castaneda is trying to use his own edit as a source for his prior mistakes.


 * I am fixing the article, restoring the sources and facts that were there, and removing unsupported info.DreamGuy