Talk:Kwok Wing Hang and others v Chief Executive in Council and another

Unsourced ‘case of two Kwoks’ material
the case for including the popular name of the case is somewhat doubtful, but even ignoring that, simply reverting the removal of unsourced material without including a source is highly disruptive. Docentation (talk) 23:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Some general plans on other things to include herein
Hello chaps. I shall leave some general information here about things I intend to do in future to this page—do ping me if you wish to do anything in any connexion below. (I suppose that I shall also be motivated to do them by my having written them down here.)

At present I have left out a number of bits of the case. In particular, these are the cross-appeals in the Court of Appeal case, that is, on grounds 2, 3, and 4, as well as a number of the intricacies of the argument. There is also room for further expansion of the background in ground 1 to the Court of Appeal’s views on continuity, though it is of course notable that the judgement does not directly tie any of the historical background to any specific disposition (as far as I can remember from my reading thereof), and that therefore it may be rather difficult to select some set of particularly important historical nuggets from their account.

It would also be good to expand on the various precedents cited vis à vis the constitutionality of the POO scheme mentioned in the Court of Appeal’s judgement, though I think separate articles on those cases would also be necessary.

Litton wrote something in Ming Pao that could be summarised (there’s an English version which I assume is original on Twitter someowhere) in the reaction section.

Docentation (talk) 22:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)