Talk:L&L Energy

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because articles about the company have been published by respectable, independent, specialized sources such as the Wall Street Journal, Fool.com and Seekingalpha.com http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120130-704736.html http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llen http://www.fool.com/quote/nasdaq/l-l-international-holdings-inc/llen -- Itemirus (talk)  15:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The WSJ thing looks like a press release to me and the others don't seem to be reliable sources (and even if they are, this is not in-depth coverage). Given that you seem to have been around for a while, how come you create stubs without any claim to notability and no independent reliable sources? --Randykitty (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * In my humble opinion, all the companies listed on the two major American stock exchanges (NYSE and Nasdaq) deserve an article just for being listed there; said that, the company has been the subject of independent articles on notable specialized websites. I admit I've been too hasty in writing the article but a stub is just that, a brief description. A Google search for L&L Energy yields thousand of results.-- Itemirus (talk)  16:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I get four hits on a news search for this company. That's good enough for CSD. Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   16:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

SEC case makes L&L more interesting
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2014/33-9565.pdf

This action arises out of a fraudulent scheme by L&L Energy and Dickson Lee to create the appearance that L&L was run by a professional management team and conceal Lee’s single-handed control of the company. L&L Energy is a Seattle-headquartered coal company with all of its operations in China and Taiwan. 203.186.110.162 (talk) 04:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)