Talk:L'Hermite's expedition/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Pass The article meets the GA criteria of citations.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) Under normal circumstances I wouldn't hold an article for lack of images, but I feel that there are plenty of potential images for this one. Any of the major people, ships, or locations involved can surely be illustrated on the article.
 * I would love to have an image for this, but unfortunately I have been unable to locate one of either the events, ships or men involved.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Something is wrong with the Order of Battle table. The bottom "source" cell seems to be disrupting the whole table. This should be fixed.
 * It looks fine to me, what seems to be the problem?--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * All of the cells below the title cell seem to be only stretching to around 80% of the screen width while the reference cell is at 95% of the width, leaving a strange gray area on the right part of the table. If there's no problem on your computer I'll assume its a problem with mine and not worry about it. — Ed! (talk) 06:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Is there any kind of infobox that we can use for this kind of article?
 * The only one that srpings to mind - the military conflict one - doesn't really apply here as there was no concerted British response to the operation and thus it would be overbalanced.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Overall:
 * On Hold with just a few minor nitpicks. — Ed! (talk) 03:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * As with the other article under review, I have made some replies and am awaiting feedback. Many thanks for reviewing the article.
 * All right. The issues are addressed to my satisfaction. Well done. — Ed! (talk) 06:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thankyou very much - I will be adding an image when one comes to hand.--Jackyd101 (talk) 10:54, 15 August 2009 (UTC)