Talk:Lê Văn Duyệt/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Minor question: is the "goddes" mentioned in the Family and personal life section supposed to be "goddess?" Also, in the Conflict section, there's the word "rorting;" is that a typo as well (or just something I'm not familiar with)?
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There's one line in the legacy section that needs a citation. I added a cn to point out where it is.
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Images all look good.
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Excellent work on this article, which is quite interesting to read. There's just a couple typos and the one missing footnote holding the article up from passing. I made a series of edits to the article, you might want to check and make sure everything is correct. Parsecboy (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Citations added as you requested and I also fixed some typo. Thank a lot for your review.--AM (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, everything looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)