Talk:L. F. Rushbrook Williams

Untitled
i would like to have these 'multiple issues' explained to me. the article is not a personal reminsicence, it has information about the person. every claim is backed up by sources, with full details given. there are multiple sources. i don't understand how it qualifies as a 'fan site'-- this person is a historical personage who had no wikipedia entry under his name. there is no praise or acclaim in the article. --jlburton
 * I have had a go at fixing the style issues. No problem really, just that WP strives for a consistent look and feel between articles. As you said, you cited sources, so that was not the problem. You might find it helpful to read WP:MOS and WP:How to write a great article. To sign your posts, type ~, or just click on the signature icon above the editing field. The four tildes are then automatically transformed into your user name, complete with time stamp, when you save. Thanks for the new article. -- JN 466  00:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Publication years
It would be great if you could add the publication years and isbn numbers of his books. Cheers, -- JN 466  00:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)