Talk:L. Ron Hubbard and psychiatry

Content split rationale
Biographical material about a 20th century person is sufficiently different in content from the material about the 21st century movement and its policies (e.g. Tom Cruise on Matt Lauer; etc). Additionally, a split for the biographical material allows easier inclusion in the Hubbard biographical article series. Feoffer (talk) 23:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it should all remain together. Why sunder the discussion of L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology? That makes absolutely zero sense. If you wish to link this information on the bio page, simply link it. Onel 5969  TT me 00:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The level of detail in the biographical material being added seemed to be undue weight in comparison to minimal detail about the organization and it its ongoing policies.  Seemed like a perfect case for a summary style subarticle where excess detail is summarized and then a subarticle  for readers who want the  the extended quotes and extensive biographical details.
 * In any case, extra eyes always appreciated, if you feel strongly that one article is better than an article and a subarticle, that's cool :) Feoffer (talk) 01:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps also worth pointing out that when the expanded material is reincorporated into one article, article size is >60k, which WP:SPLIT defines as "Probably should be divided (although the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading time)". But if you still fill 1 article is best, that's cool. :) Feoffer (talk) 01:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Discussion copied to 'Talk:Scientology_and_psychiatry