Talk:LEGO Ninjago P.I.X.A.L

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because I worked really hard on it And isn't Wikipedia suposed to have a lot of articles
 * I know that you have worked hard on the article, however the character itself doesn't meet the WP:GNG for an article here. However the article could be a plausible redirect to the main Lego Ninjago article, which I changed the page to. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

That's why I can't look at my page And what your saying doesn't make any sense to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by P.I.X.A.L207 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Can't you please just let me keep my page — Preceding unsigned comment added by P.I.X.A.L207 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * @P.I.X.A.L207: We don't need an article on every single thing. There's a standard that things have to make before they get articles. It doesn't look like PIXAL meets that standard, so it may not have an article. (Simply put, the basic standard is, are there magazine or newspaper stories that write about the thing? Or has anybody written a book about it?) —C.Fred (talk) 19:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)