Talk:LET TG-10

I have photographs and lots of technical specifications for all of these aircraft... I'll upload them soon, when I get some more free time.

Merge
Merge with LET L-13 Blanik as it only a designation not the main aircraft type.Petebutt (talk) 03:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose - it's not unprecedented for otherwise-identical military and civilian types to have seperate articles, and the Blanik's page is already at a reasonable length - merging this might make it WP:UNDUEly slanted torwards the TG-10. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Apparently no consensus to merge this from more than a year ago, so I will remove the tags. - Ahunt (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't think these are mergeable as the TG-10 label covers L-13/L-23/L-33. But Pete's underlying question remains unanswered: was the TG-10 really a "development" of the Czech aircraft or just an Americanised variant of it, e.g. re-instrumented?TSRL (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LET TG-10. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324082626/http://www.koaa.com/news/af-academy-buys-19-new-gliders-for-cadet-training/ to http://www.koaa.com/news/af-academy-buys-19-new-gliders-for-cadet-training/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716224546/http://www.aetc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=7206 to http://www.aetc.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=7206

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)