Talk:LGBT rights in Arizona

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307075208/http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/arizona-adoption-law to http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/arizona-adoption-law
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120501001435/http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/arizona-hate-crimes-law to http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/arizona-hate-crimes-law
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311221248/http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/arizona-birth-certificate-law-gender-identity-issues to http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/arizona-birth-certificate-law-gender-identity-issues

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Signature certification
A recent addition regarding a ballot initiative in Mesa said that the signatures had been certified. However, the source for that info was this tweet, and if you check that tweet, it links to a source that says just the opposite - that there is still a several day period for those signatures to be challenged (and that concurs with the source already in the section.) As such, I have removed the claim and the use of the tweet as a reference. (I also removed the word "forcibly" to describe the placing of an initiative on the ballot; a ballot initiative is a fairly standard democratic process, and I can't think of anywhere else where placing something on a ballot is considered "forcible". ) --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)