Talk:LGBT rights in Florida

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT rights in Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621050533/https://justice.law.stetson.edu/lawrev/abstracts/PDF/33-1Turbe.pdf to http://justice.law.stetson.edu/LAWREV/abstracts/PDF/33-1Turbe.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130504034022/http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/florida-hate-crimes-law to http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/florida-hate-crimes-law

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:57, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060515070217/http://www.aclufl.org/news_events/index.cfm?action=viewRelease&emailAlertID=353 to http://www.aclufl.org/news_events/index.cfm?action=viewRelease&emailAlertID=353
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150617020222/http://www.wogx.com/story/29174728/leesburg-passes-lgbt-anti-discrimination-law to http://www.wogx.com/story/29174728/leesburg-passes-lgbt-anti-discrimination-law
 * Added tag to http://www.tequesta.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2958
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130116092639/https://www.scgov.net/HR/Pages/Diversity.aspx to https://www.scgov.net/HR/Pages/Diversity.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

HB 1557 split proposal
As I have said over on the talk page of Disney and Florida's "Don't Say Gay" bill, I think the bill needs it's own article. Now obviously what is written here in this section right now isn't enough for an article, but I think a lot more can be written about it and merged with the aforementioned Disney article. As for what the new article's name would be, Don't Say Gay is clearly the WP:COMMONNAME, however I'm sure many will argue that it isn't WP:NEUTRAL. So I'm keen to hear what others have to say about that. --Pokelova (talk) 01:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe title the article " "Don't Say Gay" bill" with the common name in quotations. X-Editor (talk) 03:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * House Bill 1557 would be a better name. Executive Order 13769 isn't titled Muslim ban on Wikipedia either. X-Editor (talk) 03:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I also propose that the start of the article be similiar to Executive Order 13769. "House Bill 1557, titled Parental Rights in Education bill, and labeled the "Don't Say Gay bill" by critics." X-Editor (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I would say it's a nickname more than a label, so i.e. "House Bill 1557, titled Parental Rights in Education bill, and nicknamed the "Don't Say Gay bill" by critics..." to me would be a great way to open the article. Endwise (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Certainly enough coverage in RS for stand alone notability. I'd support creation and expansion of a new article. Mr Ernie (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd support an article on the bill as well. There has definitely been enough coverage of it in reliable sources to merit it having a page on the topic. I agree with X-Editor when it comes to the article title. Historyday01 (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Support a standalone article for this bill, definitely meets WP:GNG. However, I don't think it should be named "Don't say gay bill" since this in not neutral; it should be named House Bill 1557. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I would support a standalone article too, but it should be called House Bill 1557, as "Don't say gay bill" is a nickname used only by the bill's opponents, and Wikipedia should not take sides like that. Endwise (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I Support a standalone article and I would also support it being named "Don't Say Gay" as a title for thearticle itself, as "Don't Say Gay" is the common name. If we have articles like Russian gay propaganda law then why can't such an article on the bill be called the "Don't Say Gay" bill? Historyday01 (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Support per above. If Disney is able to get its own article on its opposition, the bill should. Hasn't been any opposition here since. With regard to the title, there are fair arguments for each but I will remain neutral. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * BTW for all you guys: Draft:Florida_House_Bill_1557 now exists. Feel free to add on! InvadingInvader (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)