Talk:LOTTE airship

Comments on the order of the tables
The text is well organised and provides a wide range of information including the developmental history, design significance, and applications of the LOTTE airship. However, the table about airship research mission is chronological order and table about development history is chronological flashbacks, which I think could be unified into chronological order for easier reading. Taiki Shuttle (talk) 12:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, I have taken your advice and changed the article. JEREMY1117 (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Comments on the order of the tables
Upon reading your article, I can appreciate the comprehensive historical background and development process, including the research and testing timeline, which underscores the legitimacy of the LOTTE airship project and highlights the importance of the certification process. Your meticulously crafted background section presents well-founded information on key figures such as Professor Bernd Helmut Kröplin, as well as relevant details about the University of Stuttgart and Airship Technologies GmbH. This information aids in understanding the team and institutions behind the project, providing readers with a broader perspective. Your article's introduction of the quasi-rigid airship design concept effectively illustrates its advantages over traditional rigid and non-rigid airships, showcasing innovation in design and technology. However, the technical description of the airship might seem somewhat simplified. It would be beneficial to delve deeper into its innovative aspects and technical challenges, such as the solar power system, lightweight structural design, aerodynamic shape design, structural materials, and aerodynamic performance. Overall, you have provided a comprehensive overview of the "LOTTE" autonomous solar-powered airship, covering its development history, key figures and institutions, project achievements, innovative design concepts, and its final disposition. This information plays a positive role in helping readers understand the full scope and significance of the project.--BK-L023 (talk) 12:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your input! JEREMY1117 (talk) 13:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Quit nice!
The article provides a comprehensive overview of the LOTTE airship's design, features, and operational history. Key points include its innovative hybrid design combining a helium-filled envelope with a rigid internal structure, which offers enhanced stability and performance. The airship's applications, such as surveillance, reconnaissance, and environmental monitoring, are also highlighted. Additionally, the article discusses the technological advancements and strategic partnerships that have contributed to the development and deployment of the LOTTE airship. Daath3 (talk) 13:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your comment. JEREMY1117 (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Very interesting!
Hi! I really enjoyed reading your article, it is well written and complete. I just corrected some unnecessary 'voids' between the end of some phrases and the reference link. I noticed that after the 'At the end of 1991, a team of students, scientists and teachers was formed, and about 20 months later the first flight of an airship called LOTTE 1 was successful. Basic experience was gained with the design and flight characteristics of the airship' phrases there is a blank space. Was it intentional? I feel like reducing the blank space could be an improvement, so I did it. Moreover, in the 'Range of tasks that can be applied' section, could all the risks be put in the form of a list? Anyway, really good job! 77Davide77 (talk) 14:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello! Thank you very much for your suggestions and changes :) JEREMY1117 (talk) 08:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)