Talk:LS3/5A/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jamesx12345 (talk · contribs) 20:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll take this one on, having seen it languish far too long. Jamesx12345 20:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: my responses indented:
 * "as opposed to the "LS5" loudspeaker, intended for studio monitoring" - does "studio monitoring" here mean an indoors studio?
 * yes, proper studio environment
 * "using headphones is unsatisfactory" - is there a straightforward reason for this?
 * none was cited, but then listening through speakers and through headphones isn't the same experience at all.
 * "There were no commercial constraints." - does that mean that they didn't design it to be sold, and so there was no emphasis on "features"?
 * Yes. It was primarily for own use, and the Beeb, being the Beeb, didn't care about cost required to achieve the necessary quality. £100k is quite a large sum of money to be spent on development in the early seventies
 * "built using the" - mention that these are drive units.
 * added.
 * "had initiated tendering" - odd use of past tense - relative to what?
 * The follow-on is that the spec had to be changed in mid process. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 02:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in this part of the review. Jamesx12345 19:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * "Its internal walls are heavily damped, only specific speaker..." - already mentioned.
 * "The name was..." - it isn't immediately clear that the name is Rogers.
 * "Spendor's production amounted..." - the other produces could be introduced better.
 * "and became easier to drive" - redundant to decrease in resistance.
 * "matched by computer." - not very precise. "matched to each other by computer testing" or something is a bit clearer.
 * The Legacy section is a bit odd. The source mentions the LS3 a few times, but I don't really see the connection
 * Will this come to anything?
 * Note 1 is a bit confusing. A note on what the year means (first manufactured?) would help.


 * Just pinging you to let you know there are still a few things to be done. Jamesx12345 13:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I have now tried to clarify the points raised. Further comments welcome. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 03:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delay. Looks fine now. Thanks, Jamesx12345 21:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)