Talk:LW4 (classification)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 18:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I am starting a review on this article North8000 (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Review comments
This is one of a group of 7 "LW" articles that I am reviewing at the same time. There is one item in common to all 7 which, rather than repeat, I located centralized discussion at the LW3 (classification) review. It concerns structure, governing body info and terminology for the standard and implementation of it. North8000 (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Resolved with tweaks that I made. North8000 (talk) 01:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Would it be feasible to get an image for this article? North8000 (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The team has not been able to find images for LW3 or LW4. We managed to snag images for all the other classes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool.  Then it meets the criteria as written. North8000 (talk) 13:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

You might want to consider an expansion of the title later, but IMO that is not an issue affecting the review result. North8000 (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

GA criteria final checklist
Well-written Factually accurate and verifiable Broad in its coverage Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute Illustrated, if possible, by images
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets this criteria for the titled topic.   North8000 (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Has no images but meets this criteria as written.   Editors have tried but have been unable to get images.  North8000 (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

This article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article
This article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. Congratulations! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Reviewer