Talk:LaGuardia Airport bombing

Untitled
The bombing event which occurred at LaGuardia was a major terrorist incident in NY, killing 11 people and remaining unsolved to this day. Its deserving of its own page, and also make categorization of this terrorist incident by year and regional more useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bschoeni (talk • contribs) 08:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * While this article does expand on the referenced duplication (citing the size of explosion, location of the bomb, and the status of the crime), it would seem more appropriate to merge this information into the original article rather than to create a whole new article for it. (I may be wrong, bear with me. A bit new to newpage patrolling). Warbirdadmiral (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I dunno. I think the LaGuardia page is large enough as it is. If we trebbled the size of the description of every accident or injury at that airport, we'd definitely be pushing the size limit, and there's still some non-accident-or-injury related content needed. Why not just slap a stub template on this article? It's well sourced... 24.177.123.74 (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, dude, this guy is still working on that article. You have to take down the prod. (Does he even know we're here?) 24.177.123.74 (talk) 08:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Removed the prod. But, if the article is still being worked on, it should probably be worked on in a sandbox, rather than as a published article. Though, more information coming in... seems to fill out the article nicely. Warbirdadmiral (talk) 08:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

FALN link is ambiguous
The "FALN" link requires disambiguation, and the article provides no information to help with determining which "FALN" it is referring to. Mdnavman (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)mdnavman

Aviation incident
Its been decided after some talk, that this and other airport bombings or massacres are not to be put in aviation accident templates or categorized as a aviation accident or incident. If you disagree, don't revert, but instead come over to this discussion and we'll listen to your opinion....William 19:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)