Talk:La Manada sex abuse case of Pozoblanco

First line
, you re-bolded the title name. However, that is exactly what I did at the beginning of the article, being reverted later by per MOS:AVOIDBOLD. Iñaki LL (talk) 20:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The reason to do this is to avoid this: La Manada sex abuse case of Pozoblanco is the legal process. It's very awkward to refer to the sex abuse case as a legal process instead of just stating that it was a case without redundancy. Bold isn't always needed; if bolding the title requires awkward writing or redundancy, the title should not be bold. UnnamedUser (open talk page) 21:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I think "refers to" would fix the situation, but I do not think EN WP considers it an acceptable definition formula. I see the Case_of_the_Anti-Soviet_"Bloc_of_Rightists_and_Trotskyites" is pretty long, still it is bold. Also, it uses the formula "the case was (...) a trial". I do not know what the exact formula is best, but so far this is the widest used one, as far as I know. Iñaki LL (talk) 21:33, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, this will be something for me to keep in mind. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 03:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)