Talk:La Perla (clothing)

New version
Dear Wikipedia users, I have been asked by a communications company (on behalf of La Perla) to upload an improved version of this page. This version is based on the existing one, but the following have been improved: Because of the conflict of interest guideline we cannot directly edit the page, so we have uploaded the new version to this temporary subpage: User:Giulia H2/La Perla/New. Please consider replacing the current version with this new and better one. Giulia H2 (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * all unsourced or promotional sentences have been removed
 * structure and formatting have been improved (in compliance with the Manual of Style)
 * all sources have been checked, and broken ones have been replaced with new ones
 * outdated or factually wrong information has been corrected
 * a few Creative Commons images have been added to the page
 * Good, the current version is a mess. I like the pictures, but why remove these books?
 * Also, why remove perfume?
 * 125.173.15.191 (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, why remove perfume?
 * 125.173.15.191 (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * You are right, that was overlooked. I have added the first source back. The perfumes are less a focus to the company than they were before, that is why they were removed (with the second source). Giulia H2 (talk) 11:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * This is an encyclopedia! If they exist or existed in the past they should be in the article 125.173.15.191 (talk) 13:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, I will add them to the Products section, with source. Thank you. Giulia H2 (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Now it looks ok, I’ll update it for you. You think the company could thank me with some free lingerie? (no just kidding). And with that bad joke I go to bed, bye 125.173.15.191 (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! But I don’t think that would be appropriate, sorry ;) Giulia H2 (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I will leave the edit request tag for a few days in case someone else (hopefully a registered user or administrator) wants to review the new version and compare it to the old one. I think it is an improvement, but please make your own judgement. If you find anything that might still be wrong or poorly sourced, please fix it. Thank you :) Giulia H2 (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2016 (UTC)