Talk:La Salle Green Hills/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:La Salle Green Hills/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Update: First, I want to apologize for this late review. I typically have articles on my watch list, but for whatever reason, the two articles I reviewed on June 4 did not get added. Unfortunately this article does not yet qualify for GA status. There are still issues with WP:MoS compliance, non-encyclopedic prose, areas missing citations, and a great deal of OR. I hope the editors will take at the GA articles at WikiProject Schools, adjust "La Salle Green Hills" accordingly and renominate. Best, epicAdam (talk) 00:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)