Talk:Labour Party (Netherlands)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

NO CONSENSUS to move article, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 03:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Labour Party (Netherlands) → Partij van de Arbeid – "The party is called 'Partij van de Arbeid'. Though Labour Party is the English translation, that is not what the Dutch party is called. —JackSparrow Ninja 00:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)" copied from WP:RM by   AjaxSmack      01:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey
Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

Survey - in opposition to the move

 * 1) Oppose per WP:UE but might support a move to Dutch Labour Party. The party's official website uses the English name as in "This is the English website of the Dutch Labour Party, in the Netherlands known as Partij van de Arbeid (the PvdA)", "Manifesto, Dutch Labour Party" , "Discussion Paper Prepared by the Dutch Labour Party’s Working Group on Europe" , &c.  (Plus, party van could be ambiguous.) —   AjaxSmack     01:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. All Dutch parties have been standardized in this version per WP:UE. I would prefer to keep this name Labour Party (Netherlands), because it is clear and simple. C mon 12:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose per C mon; I'm not sure about Dutch Labour Party. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) C mon is right. JACO  PLANE  • 2007-01-31 22:22
 * 5) Oppose per above. The English translation certainly takes priority. 205.157.110.11 02:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose. Per AjaxSmack and the party's own website. -- Sig Pig  |SEND - OVER 04:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Discussion
Add any additional comments
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Allies?
I realise that PvdA is currently governing with CDA and has formed a 'purple' government in the past with VVD, but which party or parties are PvdA's preferred coalition allies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Free Socialist (talk • contribs) 15:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Politically, it's closest to the Dutch Green Party (GroenLinks, meaning Green Left), but it has also coöperated fruitfully with D66 (Dutch Liberal Democrats) and the SP (Socialist Party).82.176.204.198 (talk) 14:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Dutch Labour Party → — To move this article in line wither other international labour parties, which have the country in parenthesis, rather than at the beginning of the article title. See, for example, Labour Party (UK), Labour Party (Turkey), Labour Party (Ireland), and many more. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Attacking the Right
Why all right parties are being described with insults like "eurosceptics" or "Anti-immigration" and from negative point of view and parties from the Left are not? Why socialist parties are not described as "anti-capitalist" for instance? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.138.239.137 (talk) 22:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Representation table
Can the table at the beginning of the Representation section, giving a year by year overview without source references, be removed from the article? It seems overly specific and contains partially redundant information. – Editør (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have removed the table. – Editør (talk) 09:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Labour Party (Netherlands). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161125052156/http://dnpp.ub.rug.nl/dnpp/pp/pvda/leden/per_jaar to http://dnpp.ub.rug.nl/dnpp/pp/pvda/leden/per_jaar
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161125052156/http://dnpp.ub.rug.nl/dnpp/pp/pvda/leden/per_jaar to http://dnpp.ub.rug.nl/dnpp/pp/pvda/leden/per_jaar

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Headquarters forced to move
As of the results of the last general elections, the party huge defeat to 9 seats influenced the party funds which forced the party to leave the capital for a little cheap office in The Hague. Change the adress in Rijswijkseweg 60 The Hague, the new headquarters of the Dutch Labour Party(source: Chamber of Commerce www.kvk.nl) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashwin676 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Fist and rose
If someone has reliable sources on the party’s use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose. Keriluamox (talk) 10:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification of discussion involving this article
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Political parties regarding the inclusion of the party flag in the infobox of this article. The thread is Party flags in infoboxes. Thank you. — Ætoms  [talk] 23:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Mention of current leader in lead
"The Leader of the Labour Party is Attje Kuiken" appears, from what evidence I can find, to be incorrect. The tables draw distinctions between various offices, and it appears that Kuiken holds an office other than Leader. Harfarhs (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)