Talk:Labyrinth Lord

Comments
Dangerously close to just an advertisement for Labyrinth Lord. I don't particularly care, but eventually someone will raise the issue here. If anyone is editing this, it would be good to trim out statements that read like sales literature and stick to facts. 173.170.154.235 (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion
Since the article is up on AfD, I'm going to start doing some surgery. There's a lot of extraneous info and it reads a little too much like an advertisement, so I'm going to cut a lot of that and add whatever sources I can find. zorblek (talk) 19:06, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * More power to you. :) 204.153.84.10 (talk) 19:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

The Deletionist point is irrelevant and if this article is deleted then the entirety of wikipedia should be considered for deletion. This article pertains to a game and is in no way any more an advertisement than any other roleplaying game or most games or hobbies for that matter. Further steps to delete this will push for a deletion of Wikipedia as a whole across the board. If each article is under such scrutiny wikipedia is no longer necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forvalaka (talk • contribs) 20:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well now, that's just hyperbole. I do feel the article has a place here, and so far the AFD respondents seem to mostly agree, so let's see how much the article can be improved in the meantime. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 02:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Hyperbole is exaggerating and I am suggesting that if the Deletionists just "arbitrarily" decide what to remove, then Wikipedia, as a whole, no longer has a purpose and as such, I challenge the need for it. If facts can be randomly deleted, then what is the purpose of Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forvalaka (talk • contribs) 04:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)