Talk:Lactarius vinaceorufescens/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:27, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Easy passer here; but quick question: Why is he in Category:Edible fungi? Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Umm.... late night and the coffee was wearing off? Fixed. Sasata (talk) 05:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Been there ;) Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:56, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Lactarius vinaceorufescens passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: