Talk:Lactifluus rupestris/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 03:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Nice one. :) Two things:
 * In Discovery and class we have "..the taxon cannot be included because it does not have an areolate (cracked) and dry cap surface.."; but in Descr., it is "The cap surface is somewhat sticky, smooth to somewhat cracking..". Clarify :)
 * Have clarified that it's insufficiently areolate to fit into Edules. Sasata (talk) 03:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Epithet rupestris.  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  10:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Also done. Thanks for another review, Robert. Sasata (talk) 03:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass!  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  04:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Lactarius rupestris passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: