Talk:Laguna del Negro Francisco/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 16:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status using the template below. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for going through these issues, Jo-Jo. A few things: No sarcasm about "polymitic"! I had never heard the term before and thought the explanation you gave was concise and interesting. I think we shouldn't use the undefined undefined template if it leads to grammatical issues like this, minor though it may be. The other fixes are all good. :)

Regarding breadth: Lonely Planet is a reliable source, it's a well-known guidebook company that factchecks - via WP:RS, no issues there. The bird counts article is slightly more difficult, but via Google, Revisa Tierra Culta seems to be a pretty standard Chilean online magazine and again WP:RS gives us no reason to doubt their reliability. This is a judgement call, but I think there's no issue with the information. I think the other two sources regarding environmental damage are relevant: they both discuss damage to the lacustrine complex of Laguna del Negro Francisco, reference it explicitly as the site and subject of the controversy, and mention the Ramsar connection, which is already in the article. As to reliability, El Mostrador is a well-known Chilean newspaper extant since 2000 with its own Wiki page, and Radio Cooperativa is a large and well-known radio-based news organization extant since 1935. I think this info should be included in the article to make sure it covers all aspects of Laguna del Negro Francisco. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that fixing the Convert template might be something worth asking for on Template talk:Convert. It also seems like the refuge may be the same building already mentioned in the article. I did apply the magazine source, but I am still concerned that the environmental damage is not strictly pertinent to this article as "Valle Ancho" is only partially within the watershed of LDnF. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

congratulations! This is a very good article. :) Glad you nominated it and I could review it. Ganesha811 (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)