Talk:Lah number

Notation
Is the proposed notation


 * $$L(n,k)=\left\lfloor\begin{matrix} n \\ k \end{matrix}\right\rfloor$$

standard? Or do authors generally content themselves with $$L(n,k)$$? Bender05 06:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Relation with Stirling numbers
The article states the Lah-numbers are related to the Stirling numbers but does not give precise relations. To fill the gap I added such a relation in the Identities and relations section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheoricienQuantique (talk • contribs) 13:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Combinatorial interpretation
In the combinatorial interpretation, the description "in such a way that all elements of the same subset are linearly ordered" doesn't seem to match, say, L(3,1) including {(132)}, which appears not to be "linearly ordered". Perhaps the description can be reworded? Robertd (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)