Talk:Lake Cowal

Merger from Lake Cowal Campaign

 * I propose that the Lake Cowal Campaign article be merged with the Lake Cowal article - showing as a separate section in the latter article--A Y  Arktos 23:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * agree - campaign page is small now and would benefit from being attached to main page.--naught101 23:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Now merged--A Y  Arktos 00:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Is the mine still using the cyanide process? If not then this whole article is completely dated and needs revision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.120.206 (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality
Lake Cowal Campaign and Barrick Gold reads as if it's been written by a protester. It's totally one sided and is without sources. Bidgee (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Cowal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100920072245/http://barrick.com/GlobalOperations/AustraliaPacific/Cowal/default.aspx to http://www.barrick.com/GlobalOperations/AustraliaPacific/Cowal/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)