Talk:Lake Hayward (Wisconsin)

Hangon rationale:

First, notablility is a non-issue. There's a lot of consensus that named geographic places are notable.

Second, has the nominator done a good faith search to determine that this cannot be expanded at all? Real life interrupted my work on this, but I seriously doubt that a lake in Wisconsin cannot expand beyond a stub. (And sheesh, give me more than two minutes to expand the thing.)-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  23:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Refactoring my comment, now that I've had a chance to calm down a bit. Sorry for the outburst, but thanks for the reminder of how new editors feel when an article gets a speedy tag.

"Unlikely to expand" is not a valid CSD reason. At the time of tagging there was content and context, and it was a perfectly valid stub. It told the reader exactly what and where the subject was, and even gave a coordinate so the reader could look it up on a map. If the article never expanded beyond that, it would still be a valid article, meeting both WP:N and WP:V.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I added a citation to this article. If the nominator had look at the citation and seen the map that the lake is located within Hayward, Wisconsin.Thank you-RFD (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Hayward (Wisconsin). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220150347/http://www.wisconsinslakes.com/sawyer_county_lakes.html to http://www.wisconsinslakes.com/sawyer_county_lakes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)