Talk:Lake Laogai

Who is hunting for Appa?
The summary on this page states that Appa is also hunted by someone unbeknownst to them. However, on the List of Avatar Episod page, it says that Zukois the one hunting for Appa.

So, is Zuko the one hunting Appa, or someone we dont know yet? (11987 09:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC))


 * No, it's Zuko. We just have the Nick summary on the list page and the TvGuide summary here. -Dylan0513 19:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Date of Lake Laogai
Again, according to Nick.com's schedule:, Lake Laogai tommorow will be replaced with an Avatar marathon of The Drill, City of Walls and Secrets, Tales of Ba Sing Se, and Appa's Lost Days. If this is true, Lako Laogai will almost definitly air on the 27th of October. Nick's pulling a fast one on us again! -Dylan0513 21:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Once again I vote we store Nick studios, steal the co-creators, and hand them over to Cartoon Network.


 * Yeah, like CN would do any better. I actually like this. 2 episodes in concecutive weeks then take a week off and build up hype for the season finale 2 parter or not. -Dylan0513 03:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Meh. I'd just settle for Nick getting a halfway decent website. Like, without overuse of Flash (so you can actually link to things) and less annoying sound effects. Have to see what happens on this one, seeing as, with Nickelodeon, you never really know what‘s going to air until it does. :P--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 04:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC) If it helps at all, TV.com says that the new episode is going to air tonight.--TriPredRavage 20:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I just heard the commercial on Nick. It airs tonight. - D•a•r•k•n • e • s•s•L•o•r•d • i•a•n ••• C •••  22:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

you wish! i just did research on the nick website and they arnt saying anything! this sucks! so far th new ep isnt coming out today ;.; MetalBladeX4 00:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * What the heck?! This article says it airs on a Saturday! What the heck? - D•a•r•k•n • e • s•s•L•o•r•d • i•a•n ••• C •••  00:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

If you actually read you would see that Tv.com is wrong for once and that TvGuide's dates are messed up! -Dylan0513 01:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I do not think it is as much Tv.com and TvGuide.com then as it is Nickelodeon. Nick did not even fill in an episode summary for their Friday night 8:00 slot until today (if I am correct).  It is quite likely that it was originally intended to be released tonight but was not.  It is highly unlikely that it is scheduled to air tomorrow at any time.  -User:Whitlockite  21:55, 20 October 2006

No, Nick changed it a day or two before the episode came on and everyone was wrong. It was on their schedule and these idiots should check all their sources before continuisly editing something. -Dylan0513 02:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

More likely aspect is that they will air lake laogai on the 3rd of november and push everything else back. There was probably some processing error and they had to go back and fix something in the episode. User:Purpender 12:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

It's not on the 27th. I think it's a holloween marathon. Keyblade Mage 16:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Keyblade Mage

Everyone stop saying on the article the episode will be on the third. You don't know that, its entirely speculative, and you can't claim it as fact in the article without a source.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

According to the Nick schedule website, both Lake Laogai and The Earth King will premire on Saturday, November 4 at 11am. (Shousetsuka 05:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC))


 * Yes, but you notice the schedule is behind an hour so it hasn't showed the 8:00 slot on Friday yet. Anything could be there. -Dylan0513 18:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * 11 AM? I sincerely doubt Nickelodeon would air new episodes then. More than likely, that was originally to be a rerun and the schedule just wasn’t updated properly when they changed things. I really think we should leave all the future episodes as TBA until we have some clearer information, since it seems fairly clear this was last-minute change.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 18:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

If you look at the nick.com schedule in the week format for the third it doesn't list an episode, but it does have lake laogai and the earth king for the fourth at noon. However, if you look at the third, they list the earth king to premier at eight. I don't think anybody knows what's going on right now with the episodes.--TriPredRavage 02:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The Nick schedule is messed up and they obviously won't air one episode before another, stop editing it until we know what is going on. -Dylan0513 21:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. I don't know what's going on, but I think its safe to say, considering the unusual timeslots and break in sequence, that errors are getting into the schedule. I did add some explantion of the changes to the article, though.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's good. I'm almost positive Nick didn't know what their schedule would be until recently/still doesn't know. All listings are messed up now. Pooldude at Tv.com has reset the dates and the people at cabletvtalk.com who have even more advanced listings are confused as well. -Dylan0513 21:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Page Defects
'Trivia' and 'Scheduling Changes' edit buttons are next to each other in Firefox. It looks weird. -Red Cape 02:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's, in my experience, a fairly common problem, caused by things like images or infoboxes changing the normal layout of the page. As far as I know, there's no way to fix it.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

i think that the date that turbonick showed the episode should not be put up as the date on the list of episodes.This showing was not ment to be so therefore the showing was not genuine.if it is put up with the turbonick date then you would have to put up the turbonick date for the other episodes as well. it seems right to put the date as when it is first aired on nick like all of the other episodes.-gregdaking2000

Please, for goodness sakes, take off the titles of all of the sections like 'Jet' and 'Appa' and 'The Mask'. The episode should be recapped in the order it happened, not that way. It's makes it harder to understand. I would do it myself, but I don't know how. Please someone, read this at take that off. Thank you.

Speculation is not for this page
Ok for those who have seen it, I am here to warn all people right now that when the synopsis goes up that NO ONE, in any way is to add that Jet is dead. As we don't actually see him die, all we have to go off of is Toph saying he is lying about being fine, and what Longshot did. I'd really like to know if anyone knows why Longshot strung his bow, because I am not a cultural historian.

Another thing is that there is to be no inclusion of Sokka/Toph shipping, Katara/Jet shipping, or any other type of boat in this article. H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 22:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I think Longshot strung the bow in defence in case more Dai Li agents came. Still a bit hard to tell though. H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 02:16, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, Longshot probably strung his bow for that reason. I mean, that's what I would do if there were crazy brainwashing people who probably just can't wait to kill me chasing after me! Most likely, Jet is dead... sadly. I guess we'll have to wait and see.


 * There's another, more...gruesome possibility. Its possible, if a little graphic for a Nick show, he wanted to end Jet's suffering. To be honest, that was my first thought, but that might be the darker parts of my personality leaking out. Heh.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for making me think that... there goes all hope for me paying attention in English... and they wouldn't do that on a Nick show that everyone, including little kids, watches.
 * Bullshit, think Harry Potter. H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 16:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah. Things that happen in Harry Potter are worse than that, and little kids read that too.

There could be many reasons why Longshot did that. I was thinking what Frye thought, but since we don't know, it could really be anything from ending Jet's suffering or preparing for more Dai Li soiders. It might be revealed in "The Earth King" or something we'll never know... Momoroxmysoxoff 22:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah mercy killing on a Nick show, that seems likely. Longshot was not even pointing his bow towards Jet, he was pointing towards a door. EsunaMeggy 20:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * He was probably preparing for more Dai Li soldiers. His arrow was not even pointed close to Jet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.229.170.30 (talk • contribs)


 * Some wise guy put Si-fi channel as proof that Jet died. I say, as far as we know, Jet's alive and well until an episode comes on that says he's dead. Master44 gives this cancer a one out of five 14:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know...
This wasn't important enough to be in the main article, but Lake Laogai's now on YouTube in case anyone was too late or not American enough to see it on Turbonick. 206.116.28.142 04:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Goodbyebluespirit.jpg
Image:Goodbyebluespirit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:GAang with Freedom Fighters.jpg
Image:GAang with Freedom Fighters.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AangJet.jpg
Image:AangJet.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)