Talk:Lake Ontario Ordnance Works/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 12:05, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Sound fixes needed
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Can we have everything in the lead also in the article?
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * For each web site, we want url, title, publisher and accessdate Fixed them up. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
 * I know that your source says that the site was purchased by the United States Department of Defense during World War II, but you know what? The Department of Defence was not created until 1947. You want the War Department.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Will leave for another week. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)