Talk:Lakselv Airport/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 20:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Non-prose review (from here):


 * No DABs but two dead links
 * Archives added. Arsenikk (talk)  15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Klevberg, Håvard (1996) needs a language parameter, assuming it's in Norwegian
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * References 30, 45, 47, 54, 55 need a language parameter. Also, I am not familiar with Norwegian websites, what makes reference 30 reliable?
 * Parameters fixed. Ref 30 is a transcription of an article in the magazine of a trade union for aircraft mechanics. I would consider the magazine reliable and thus also the transcription. I can reformat the ref to cite the magazine instead if that is preferable. Arsenikk (talk)  15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks fine cited the way it is.


 * Where did you find the offline newspaper references?
 * They are available through Atext, a proprietary and closed resource available through my university which allows searchable access to printed newspapers in an archive. Thus I have actually read all the newspaper articles. Arsenikk (talk)  15:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Good to know.


 * File licensing checks out.

I will start the prose review when these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 20:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Lead:
 * Checks out.


 * History:
 * Increased military funding was granted from 1937 and the following year, a triangular runway was built at Banak. Ambiguous, I would add a comma after "1937" to make clear the runway was built in 1938. To me, it currently sounds like funding was granted from 1937 and the following year.
 * Fixed. This is exactly the issues I need a second pair of eyes to look at :) Arsenikk (talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * In 1945, the air force operated a service from Bardufoss Air Station via Banak to Kirkenes Airport, Høybuktmoen, with correspondence to Oslo at Bardufoss. I don't understand what is meant by "service" here. Can you find a more specific term? I also don't understand what is meant by "correspondence".
 * Should be better now. Arsenikk (talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Finnmark was regarded as a tripwire and was to be sacrificed in case of a Soviet invasion. Can you link "tripwire" somewhere, and who regarded Finnmark as a tripwire?
 * Linked. Arsenikk (talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Re-establishment
 * This resulted in several Soviet infringement of Norwegian air space. infringement's?
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Norwegian authorities were wanting to delay its construction, were wanting ->> wanted?
 * Fixed. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Banak was estimated to cost NOK 4.9 million, link NOK.
 * Fixed. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Operational history


 * SAS Braathens introduced lowe-frequency low-frequency?
 * Fixed. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

The rest of the article checks out. I will pass when these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 16:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * All seen to. Thank you for the review. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  17:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)